AI EVALUATION SOLUTIONS
Human-Powered AI
Evaluation & Testing
Every AI system deployed without independent evaluation is an unmanaged liability. SingleAxis delivers structured, human-powered evaluation with auditable evidence that your AI meets safety, accuracy, and governance standards — before it reaches production.
RAG, Knowledge Bases, Document Q&A
AI Accuracy & Hallucination Testing
Hallucinations are the single largest barrier to enterprise AI adoption. Our evaluators run structured accuracy assessments across your knowledge base, testing grounding fidelity, citation accuracy, and confidence calibration. Every hallucination, fabricated source, and factual error is documented with reproducible evidence.
What we test
- Grounding verification against source documents
- Citation accuracy and attribution testing
- Confidence calibration assessment
- Edge case and adversarial input coverage
Customer-Facing AI, Public Deployments, High-Stakes Applications
AI Security Red Teaming
AI systems deployed without adversarial testing are an open attack surface. Our red team evaluators probe your system for prompt injection vulnerabilities, data leakage paths, jailbreak susceptibility, and boundary violations using structured attack taxonomies aligned to OWASP LLM Top 10.
What we test
- Prompt injection and jailbreak testing
- Data leakage and PII extraction attempts
- System prompt extraction and boundary testing
- Multi-turn manipulation and social engineering
Autonomous Agents, Tool Orchestration, Multi-Step Workflows
Autonomous Agent Safety Validation
Agentic AI introduces failure modes that traditional model testing cannot catch. Our evaluators test end-to-end agent workflows including tool selection accuracy, multi-step reasoning chains, error recovery behaviour, and guardrail effectiveness in complex real-world scenarios.
What we test
- Tool selection and API call validation
- Multi-step reasoning chain evaluation
- Guardrail and boundary enforcement testing
- Error recovery and fallback behaviour assessment
EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001
AI Regulatory Compliance Assessment
Regulatory frameworks for AI are moving from voluntary to mandatory. Our evaluation methodology produces structured evidence that maps directly to the requirements of the EU AI Act, NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and ISO/IEC 42001 — giving your compliance, legal, and risk teams audit-ready documentation.
What we test
- EU AI Act high-risk system documentation
- NIST AI RMF Govern, Map, Measure, Manage evidence
- ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system support
- Board-level governance reporting
REGULATORY ALIGNMENT
Evidence Mapped to Governance Frameworks
Our evaluation methodology produces structured findings that map directly to the categories and requirements major AI governance frameworks demand. The evidence we produce feeds directly into your compliance documentation.
EU AI Act
High-risk system documentation and conformity assessment.
NIST AI RMF 1.0
Govern, Map, Measure, Manage function alignment.
ISO/IEC 42001
AI management system certification preparation.
OWASP LLM Top 10
Security vulnerability taxonomy coverage.
Ready to evaluate your AI before launch?
Get an Evidence Report — structured, auditable proof that your AI system meets safety, accuracy, and compliance standards. Typical turnaround is 48 hours.